An artist and other viewers can add annotations to sections of the film, giving comments or critiques to the artist about a particular moment in the film. On September 30, 2007, a film category was added to DeviantArt, allowing artists to upload videos. A Creative Commons license is one of several public copyright licenses that allow the distribution of copyrighted works. On November 14, 2006, DeviantArt introduced the option to submit their works under Creative Commons licenses giving the artists the right to choose how their works can be used. Angelo Sotira currently serves as the chief executive officer of DeviantArt, Inc. Many of the individuals involved with the initial development and promotion of DeviantArt still hold positions with the project. All three co-founders shared backgrounds in the application skinning community, but it was Matt Stephens whose major contribution to DeviantArt was the suggestion to take the concept further than skinning and more toward an art community. Sotira entrusted all public aspects of the project to Scott Jarkoff as an engineer and visionary to launch the early program. ĭeviantArt was loosely inspired by projects like Winamp facelift,, ,, and, all application skin-based websites. The site flourished largely because of its unique offering and the contributions of its core member base and a team of volunteers after its launch, but was officially incorporated in 2001 about eight months after launch. DeviantArt was originally launched on August 7, 2000, by Scott Jarkoff, Matt Stephens, Angelo Sotira and others, as part of a larger network of music-related websites called the Dmusic Network. As the site grew, members in general became known as artists and submissions as arts. History Creation Original logoĭeviantArt started as a site connected with people who took computer applications and modified them to their own tastes, or who posted the applications from the original designs. On February 23, 2017, the company announced it was being acquired by Wix.com in a $36 million deal. Several years later, in 2017, the site had more than 25 million members and more than 250 million submissions. In 2011, it was the thirteenth largest social network with about 3.8 million weekly visits. In 2010, DeviantArt users were submitting about 1.4 million favorites and about 1.5 million comments daily. DeviantArt had about 36 million visitors annually by 2008. is headquartered in the Hollywood area of Los Angeles, California. The difference is very small, really just changing a function to a subroutine.Īs correctly comments, there is a larger risk of ABI incompatibility in calling a function vs calling a subroutine (similar to a void function).DeviantArt (historically stylized as deviantART) is an American online art community that features artwork, videography and photography, launched on Augby Angelo Sotira, Scott Jarkoff, and Matthew Stephens among others.ĭeviantArt, Inc. I do not have an answer why that is necessary right now. The author of CBLAS chose to implement a Fortran intermediate subroutine sdsdotsub. However, you probably could call the sdsdot function (in whichever language it is actually implemented) directly from C cblas_sdsdot. The very common reference implementation is written in Fortran, but it is not the fastest one. The functionality is in whatever BLAS implementation you install. Therefore the CBLAS does not actually contain the whole functionality. BLAS can be implemented in C or assembly, but the API is set to be Fortran. BLAS is defined using a reference Fortran implementation and a Fortran API. "What I wanna ask is actually why there is a need for a intermediate wrapper, why not write it in C?" (More detailed in this question)Īn example could be as below, with the usage of "object-closing" context manager from PEP 343 examples, and a wrapper class with close method which calls native object's destructor: with statement (from PEP 343) on the other hand guarantees that if _enter_ method of the object succeeded, then _exit_ method will be called at the end of the statement, both in case of normal execution and in case of exception. So even if in most cases _del_ method of an object is being called by GC, it is not guaranteed. The try…finally statement and the with statement provide convenient ways to do this. Programs are strongly recommended to explicitly close such objects. It is understood that these resources are freed when the object is garbage-collected, but since garbage collection is not guaranteed to happen, such objects also provide an explicit way to release the external resource, usually a close() method. Some objects contain references to “external” resources such as open files or windows. An implementation is allowed to postpone garbage collection or omit it altogether. Objects are never explicitly destroyed however, when they become unreachable they may be garbage-collected.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |